The category’s basic, off the rail: training cloth with the marketing stripped away. This page grades what the gym’s own outfitter publishes behind its prices.
The short answer: Gymshark is the gym’s own outfitter, and its 58 was set on our Represent page as the floor of the honest category: commodity cloth, honestly described, at prices that admit what the garments are. This page audits the anchor against the maker’s current published record and confirms it at 58: the hoodie its value row was costed on still stands at $52.50 in the maker’s own sale, its product page now prints the cloth’s weight beside its composition, and the afterlife is still a 30-day returns window with no repair bench behind it. Above it: lululemon at 72, Vuori at 64, Ten Thousand at 63, Cole Buxton at 62 and Rhone at 61. Alo Yoga, at 43, derived on our Vuori page, is the skip: named fabrics over the standard blend, at luxury prices, under permanent promotion.
What people actually want from Gymshark
The want under this search is training cloth that crosses to the street, at a price that admits what it is. Gymshark named it from a real place: Solihull, in the West Midlands, where Ben Francis started the house in 2012 and built it on the gym floor and the social feed at once, sponsoring the lifters its customers already followed and selling the uniform they wore. The line is the uniform made catalogue: oversized hoodies and washed rest-day sets for the hours around training, compression and stringer cuts for the hours in it, leggings and shorts in polyester-heavy blends, all of it turning over at a pace the premium houses do not attempt. This page exists because the anchor’s number was set two pages back in this series, on another house’s brief, as the floor the register’s prices are measured against, and the audit owed the record a reading on its own terms: what does the maker publish, behind the price?
The answer is a house whose honesty is its business model. The compositions stand on the product pages, the sale is a standing feature rather than an event, and nothing in the copy pretends the cloth is anything other than gym cloth. Both halves of that record are graded below, and both were already inside the 58 when it was set, which is why the audit that follows sharpens the description more than the arithmetic.
How the scores work
Same ruler as every page in this series: fabric and specification record out of 30, construction 20, fit and size range 20, value 15, longevity and repair 15. No score on this page is new: every number already stands in this series, and each card names its home. The skip’s 43 was derived on the Vuori page and is restated here, not re-derived.
The standing record, in full. The Represent page of this series set the anchor’s score new, from the published record: fabric 14, construction 10, fit 16, value 11, longevity 7. Add them: the brand score was 58, and the Vuori page reproduced it exactly, rows and all, calling the house the attainable door. This page audits each row against the maker’s current record.
Fabric, 14, stands, and the audit sharpens it. The derivation’s charges were catalogue-wide: the blends run polyester-heavy where the premium houses run cotton or print their grams, and the weights are printed on some lines and absent on others. At this check the compositions stand on the product pages, as they did, and on the costed garment the publishing record has genuinely improved: the Comfort Oversized Hoodie’s own Materials and Care block prints, in full, 100 percent cotton, 440gsm, heavyweight diagonal loopback fabric. Composition and cloth weight, on the flagship leisure garment, where the derivation found the weight absent. The improvement is printed here because it is real, and it is not cashed as a re-pricing, for the reason this series’ audits keep: the row grades the catalogue’s habit, and the habit stands entire, the training blends still polyester-heavy and the weights still absent on the lines beyond the flagship. If the weight-printing spreads across the catalogue, this row is the first to move at the next audit, and the page prints that commitment so the maker can act on it.
Construction, 10, stands. Nothing in the maker’s published record since the derivation changes the making grade in either direction: high-street making at very large scale, garment dyeing and washing as the finishing programme, no published construction standard behind any of it. An audit does not move a row on the absence of news; it records that the news is absent.
Fit, 16, stands. The costed garment runs XXS to XXL on the maker’s own page at this check, and the derivation’s welcome, sizes honestly labelled by fit family with tall ranges and extended sizes in the range, stands unnarrowed in the maker’s current record. The breadth is a catalogue’s breadth rather than a block’s consideration, which is what the derivation charged and what the row still records; it is also, at this altitude, the broadest welcome on the page.
Value, 11, stands. The row was costed on the Comfort Oversized Hoodie at $75 list and $52.50 in the maker’s own sale, and the maker’s own page at this check prices the same garment at $52.50, its door re-verified live. The perpetual sale is the record, and the row was always graded inside it: a two-year garment bought at a two-year price, honestly struck. What did not change is the arithmetic’s other half, the list price the sale is struck from, and the audit records both figures standing where the derivation left them.
Longevity, 7, stands. The maker’s own returns policy, read on its support pages at this check, gives 30 days to return unwanted items in their original condition, and faulty items are handled through support, with photos possibly required for verification and no need to send the faulty item back. Read fairly, that is a decent returns window and a reasonable fault process. What it is not is an afterlife: no repair service, no mending or spare-parts programme, no resale rail and no guarantee term that outlives the window appears anywhere in the maker’s published record. Under the test the Fjällräven audit set on this series, a longevity point is bought by a programme change an ordinary owner can claim. There has been none, in either direction, since the score was set, and the row stands with the total it anchors: 58, set on the Represent page, reproduced on the Vuori page, audited and confirmed here.
The bookkeeping, printed: lululemon’s 72, Vuori’s 64, Cole Buxton’s 62, Rhone’s 61 and the anchor’s 58 are standing scores from their pages in this series, reproduced with their rows; Ten Thousand’s 63 and Alo Yoga’s 43 were derived in the open on the Vuori page and are reproduced here with theirs. Rhone’s 61 carries the label its own page gave it, derived in the open from its garment record; nothing here re-derives it. Two garment-level facts are cited on this page as evidence, the Meta Pant’s published $138 and the anchor hoodie’s published $52.50; they belong to their listings and move no brand number by themselves.
Rested, with their standing numbers: Twillory at 79, Mizzen+Main at 76 and Ministry of Supply at 69, the Rhone page’s office-performance ladder. Those houses answer the neighbouring want, the formal room at 4pm, and their cloth is woven for it; this page grades the training day, and mixing the ladders would flatter neither. Represent at 59, the Represent page’s anchor, is rested with them: gym-to-street read as streetwear, the page where this anchor’s score was set, graded there against the silhouette houses. Nike is named without a number: this site has graded its garments, and sent its Tech Fleece home at 42 in our fleece ranking, but holds no brand record for it, and does not invent one here.
One more house belongs in prose. H&M sells training cloth at prices that undercut every card on this page, and this series derives its brand score from its ranked garments on its own page rather than borrowing one; nothing here restates or re-derives that number, and no H&M garment is scored on this page. The reader cross-shopping the anchor against the high street should read that page; the derivation there is untouched by this one.
The disclosure ledger
What each house publishes, in its own words where words exist. The audit reads this table before it reads any marketing.
| House | The fabric record, as published | The afterlife, as published |
|---|---|---|
| lululemon | Named fabrics, Warpstreme, Nulu, Everlux, with compositions printed on the product pages behind the names | Complimentary hemming in stores; no guarantee term and no resale programme stands in this series’ record |
| Vuori | Named fabrics, Meta, VersaLife, DreamKnit, sold by name and performance badge; no composition percentage and no cloth weight on the product pages; the garment’s own tag reads 100 percent polyester | The Investment in Happiness product guarantee: love it or send it back, free returns with exclusions; no repair service and no resale programme published |
| Ten Thousand | A tech-spec block on the product pages: shell fabric in percentages and shell weight in grams per square metre (Interval Short: 86 percent polyester, 14 percent spandex, 133 grams) | Free returns and exchanges published store-wide; durability as the house’s stated foundation; no repair service or term-published warranty in its record at this check |
| Cole Buxton | Cloth weights printed in grams per square metre on its own store: 280 for the tee, 420 for the fleece | No repair or resale programme stands in this series’ record |
| Rhone | Flex-Knit and its siblings named, with the moisture record our dress-shirt ranking measured at the top of its field | An anti-odour finish with a wash life, as our ranking printed; no repair or resale programme published |
| Gymshark | Compositions printed on the product pages; the flagship leisure hoodie now prints its weight as well, 100 percent cotton at 440gsm; the training blends run polyester-heavy and weights are absent on other lines | A 30-day returns window on unwanted items and a faulty-item process through support; no repair service, no resale programme and no term guarantee published |
| Alo Yoga | Three named fabrics, Airlift, Airbrush, Alosoft, sold by adjective and campaign; Airlift’s composition is the standard legging blend, about 82 percent polyester and 18 percent elastane; the men’s hero pant’s copy names no cloth at all | Returns only; no repair programme, no resale, no published guarantee, under permanent members-only promotion on its own store |
Seven brands like Gymshark, ranked
lululemon
US price at last check: the ABC Classic-Fit Pant $128.
Set at 72 on the Rhone page of this series: the same want at category scale, with the paperwork the anchor sells by name printed behind the names.
lululemon is the control experiment for this page, as Patagonia was for the technical cluster: the same register, the same five-pocket want, the opposite publishing habit. Its fabrics carry names as trademarked as any in the cluster, Warpstreme and Nulu and Everlux, and behind each name the product page prints a composition a buyer can grade. The ABC pant is the garment the category cross-shops, and the comparison is printed on the Rhone page: a gusset the initials describe, slim, classic and relaxed blocks across numbered waists and inseams, in stores where the fit can be tried, which is what the fit row of 18, the cluster’s highest, records. What caps the score is the top half and the hand: the shirts and polos are gym-adjacent in a way the pants are not, and the cloth pills and snags at a rate the longevity row prices. Fabric 20, construction 15, fit 18, value 9, longevity 10: 72, set on the Rhone page, where its ABC short also holds a garment score of 70 in our shorts ranking.
Buy the pants here first if the printed record and the fit range are the brief. The anchor below is the cheaper purchase; this is the more documented one.
Vuori
US price at last check: the Meta Pant $138 at the maker's store, confirmed at the Vuori page's check; the line's newer Meta Twill lists at $148.
Audited and confirmed at 64 on its own page of this series, No. 61: three fits and one honest price, a cloth sold by name, and a guarantee that is a returns promise.
The Meta Pant is a genuinely considered garment: three published fits, numbered waists, three inseams, one price held at $138 since before this series scored it, sold in every size in every season with no drop theatre and no members-only asterisk. The maker labels it honestly, best for active days and casual office wear, and it does not pretend to the formal room. All of that was inside the 64 when the Rhone page set it, and the audit on its own page confirmed all of it standing.
What its audit added is the ceiling, named in the open. The cloth the premium is charged on is published as a name and a badge set, and the name’s garment reads 100 percent polyester; the first maker in the cluster to print a cloth weight in grams sits one point below it, and the difference between the two fabric files is the difference between a specification and a story. And the afterlife is a returns window: the Investment in Happiness will take the garment back, and past that window no repair bench, no resale rail and no term of guarantee stands behind a $138 pant. Fabric 18, construction 12, fit 17, value 9, longevity 8. The brand score is 64, set on the Rhone page, reproduced on the Represent page, audited and confirmed on its own page.
Buy the Meta Pant for the day it was designed for, at the price it has honestly held. Buy it knowing the cloth’s specification is its name.
Ten Thousand
US price at last check: the Interval Shirt $78 at the maker's store; the Interval Pant $138.
Derived new at 63 on the Vuori page of this series: the training purist, and the only house in this cluster that prints what its cloth weighs.
Ten Thousand is the cluster’s answer to the anchor’s fabric file. Its product pages carry a tech-spec block, shell fabric in percentages and shell weight in grams per square metre: the Interval Short reads 86 percent polyester, 14 percent spandex, 133 grams, printed where a buyer can grade it before paying. No other house on this page publishes a cloth weight, and only the winner publishes compositions as a habit. The construction record is published with it, bonded seams named on the shirt’s own page, and the range is deliberately narrow: training kit, built on the house’s stated foundation of functionality and longevity, with no street half and no lifestyle rail. That narrowness is what the fit and value rows price: alpha sizes XS to XXL on a single training philosophy, and premium training prices, $78 for the shirt and $138 for the pant, without the anchor’s second life as office wear to spread them over. The afterlife is free returns and exchanges, published store-wide, and a durability claim the house states rather than instruments: no repair service or term-published warranty stands in its record at the Vuori page’s check, which is why its longevity row matches the anchor-cluster’s rather than beating it. Fabric 20, construction 13, fit 13, value 9, longevity 8: 63, derived new on the Vuori page, one point under its anchor, on a fabric file the whole cluster should study.
Buy the Interval kit if the training is the whole brief and you read spec blocks. It is the category’s most honest paperwork at a premium price.
Cole Buxton
UK prices at last check: the Sportswear T-Shirt £75 (about $100) in 280gsm cotton; the Icon Zipped Hoodie £175 in 420gsm fleece at the maker's store.
Set at 62 on the Amiri page of this series and reproduced on the Represent page: gym-to-street built from heavy cotton, with the weights printed.
Cole Buxton answers the same search from the opposite material direction: where the anchor builds the register from synthetics and volume, the London independent builds it from cotton at weights it prints, 280 grams for the tee and 420 for the fleece, on its own store. That publishing habit is why a house a fraction of the anchor’s size holds a fabric row five points above it. The deductions stand from its scoring pages: the prices carry a second digit for garments whose job is simple, the range is a capsule rather than a wardrobe, and the register is narrower, the silhouette of the gym’s golden age rather than the training week entire. Fabric 19, construction 13, fit 13, value 8, longevity 9: 62, set on the Amiri page, where the full argument stands.
Buy the Sportswear T-Shirt if the register is the brief and you want it in cotton with the weight printed. It is the anchor’s silhouette with the specification restored and the catalogue removed.
Rhone
US prices at last check: the Commuter Shirt $138; the Commuter Pant $138; polos $88 to $118.
Derived in the open at 61 on its own page of this series: the strongest performance cloth in its field, spent on a knit the office reads as gym kit.
Rhone is the anchor’s nearest relative by brief and its cautionary tale by register. The Commuter line promises the journey and the meeting in one garment, and its cloth is the genuine article: the Commuter shirt’s Flex-Knit took the best moisture score on our performance dress shirt ranking, 23 of 25, ahead of every woven rival. The same ranking sent the shirt home last, because the knit collar would not hold a tie and a two-year expected life priced it at $0.69 a wear. On this page the house is graded on the training day rather than the meeting, and it still lands fifth, because its famous garment is a shirt and its shirt is a knit, and its pants, the better garment, are the supporting act. The fit row of 17 is the house’s honest strength: three fits, a real range, and a gripper waistband on the pant that the category noticed. Fabric 17, construction 11, fit 17, value 8, longevity 8: 61, derived in the open on its own page of this series, from its garment record, and reproduced here with its rows.
Buy the Commuter Pant and the polos, as its own page advises. For the training day itself, the three houses above it publish more of what they sell.
Gymshark
US prices at last check: the Comfort Oversized Hoodie $75 at list, $52.50 in the maker's own sale at gymshark.com, confirmed at this check.
Audited at 58 on this page, confirmed on all five rows: commodity cloth at commodity prices, honestly labelled, with one printed improvement and no afterlife.
The audit’s credit first, because this house earns one its scale obscures. Gymshark sells the attainable version of the register without lying about the altitude: the compositions stand on the product pages, the fits are labelled by family, the sizes run XXS to XXL on the costed garment at this check with the range’s tall and extended sizes behind them, and the flagship hoodie stands at $52.50 in the maker’s own sale, the price its scoring page graded it at, its door re-verified live for this page. At this check its product page also prints the improvement this audit records in the open: the Comfort Oversized Hoodie’s cloth is published entire, 100 percent cotton at 440gsm, heavyweight diagonal loopback, the weight the derivation could not find on it. A catalogue that prints its flagship’s weight has started the habit its fabric row is waiting for.
What the audit holds is the ceiling, and it is the derivation’s ceiling unchanged. The training blends run polyester-heavy and the weights stop at the flagship: the rest of the catalogue publishes compositions without grams, so the fabric file remains a list of recipes with one weight among them. The construction is high-street making at a scale no other house on this page attempts, the catalogue turns over fast enough to make each garment a season’s tenant, and behind the garment there is a 30-day returns window and a faulty-item process, and nothing else: no repair bench, no resale rail, no guarantee term. Founded in Solihull in 2012 and still founder-led, the house is large and durable; the garments are two-year garments bought at two-year prices, and the value row of 11, the highest on this page, says that trade is honestly made. Fabric 14, construction 10, fit 16, value 11, longevity 7. The brand score is 58, set on the Represent page, reproduced on the Vuori page, audited and confirmed here.
Buy it in its own sale, as its scoring page advises, for training kit that knows what it is. The distance from here to the skip below is the distance between cheap and dishonest.
Alo Yoga
US prices at last check: the men's Day and Night Pant $128 and the Co-Op 7/8 Pant $138 at the maker's store, under a members-only 30 percent promotion its own store carries. This card ships without a buy link, and the honesty section prints why.
Derived new at 43 on the Vuori page of this series, and the skip here, its conviction restated from that page: named fabrics over the standard blend, luxury prices under permanent promotion, and no afterlife of any kind.
The charge is read off the maker’s own pages, and it has three counts, as the Vuori page derived them. First, the cloth. The house sells three named fabrics, Airlift, Airbrush and Alosoft, by adjective and by campaign, Luxury Is Wellness among them; the flagship’s composition is the industry-standard legging blend, about 82 percent polyester and 18 percent elastane, the same recipe every factory on earth sells. Its men’s hero garment, the Day and Night Pant at $128, is described by its own maker as performance-engineered fabric, with no composition named anywhere in its copy, and its construction record, in the maker’s own words in full, is that the pant has been made faster, stronger and better in pretty much every way. Second, the price. Men’s pants list at $128 to $168 under permanent promotional machinery on the maker’s own store, a members-only 30 percent discount and anniversary-sale tagging carried in its own product data, so the printed price is an opening bid addressed to non-members. Third, the afterlife, which does not exist: no repair programme, no resale, no published guarantee beyond returns, behind elastane-rich cloth on a seasonal drop cadence its own metadata calls Just Dropped. Fabric 13, construction 9, fit 12, value 4, longevity 5: 43, derived new on the Vuori page. Set it beside the anchor above it: Gymshark sells commodity cloth as commodity cloth, composition printed, at $52.50. The skip sells the same cloth as luxury, composition withheld, at two and a half times the price. Buy the anchor, or buy any house above it. The skip sells the photograph of a discipline.
The pattern under the ranking
The athleisure market runs on named cloth, and this page reads it from the floor up. At the floor, the anchor sells commodity cloth with its composition printed and its price admitting the category, and has now started printing its flagship’s weight as well. In the middle, the houses sell names with numbers behind them in ascending order: one spec block with grams, one gusset with percentages, one cotton fleece with the weights on the store. At the foot, the skip sells names with adjectives behind them, prices them as luxury, discounts them permanently for members, and publishes nothing else at all. Read from this end, the ladder is a publishing ladder before it is a price ladder: every step up is a step toward a specification a buyer can grade before paying.
What would move the numbers is printed so the makers can act on it. For the anchor: carry the weight-printing from the flagship hoodie across the training catalogue, as the house one point above its cluster already does, and the fabric row rises toward the file its fit and value rows deserve; publish anything at all behind the returns window, a repair bench or a guarantee term, and the longevity row follows. For the skip, the list is shorter and harder: retire the members-only asterisk, publish a composition for the men’s pant, and give the garment an afterlife. Until then, the training day is sold most honestly at the floor, by the house that prints its recipe and prices it as gym cloth, and the anchor sits sixth, at a confirmed 58, one printed weight into the habit its score is waiting on.
The ranking at a glance
| Brand | Score | The piece to buy | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| lululemon | 72 | The ABC Classic-Fit Pant | $128 |
| Vuori | 64 | The Meta Pant | $138 |
| Ten Thousand | 63 | The Interval Shirt | $78 |
| Cole Buxton | 62 | The Sportswear T-Shirt | £75 |
| Rhone | 61 | The Commuter Pant | $138 |
| Gymshark | 58 | The Comfort Oversized Hoodie, in its sale | $52.50 |
| Alo Yoga | 43 | None | $128 not spent |
The verdict: skip Alo Yoga
Alo Yoga is this page’s named loser, and the charge is the shape of its record, derived on our Vuori page and standing here. Its named fabrics resolve, on the composition line, to the standard legging blend; its men’s hero pant is sold without a composition at all, as performance-engineered fabric, faster and stronger in pretty much every way; its list prices are addressed to non-members under a permanent members-only discount; and behind the garment there is no repair, no resale and no guarantee, only a returns window. Every house above it publishes more for less money, and the floor of the honest category is the anchor itself at $52.50. Buy the cloth with the truth printed on it.
Which one to buy
For the documented pant: lululemon, 72. The ABC at $128, compositions printed, fits in stores.
For the street half: Vuori, 64. The Meta at $138, three fits, one held price, and a cloth whose specification is its name.
For training, purely: Ten Thousand, 63. The Interval kit, with the only spec block in the cluster that prints a weight.
For the register in cotton: Cole Buxton, 62. Heavy cloth, weights printed, at £75 for the tee.
For the commute: Rhone, 61. The Commuter Pant, and the polos; travel in the shirt.
For the budget, and the anchor itself: Gymshark, 58, in its own sale at $52.50.
To skip: Alo Yoga, 43. The names are adjectives, the prices are opening bids, and the afterlife is a returns window.
Questions, answered
What brand is most like Gymshark?
It depends which half of the anchor you are shopping. For training with the paperwork printed, Ten Thousand at 63: a tech-spec block with compositions and shell weights in grams, the fullest specification file in the cluster. For the street half of the same wardrobe, Vuori at 64, audited on its own page: three fits and one held price of $138. At the top of the cluster, lululemon at 72 prints the compositions behind its fabric names and fits the widest welcome. Gymshark’s own answer to the search is the price: the same category at $52.50 in its own sale.
Why did Gymshark’s score not move on its own page?
Because the audit found the record standing where its scoring page left it, with one improvement recorded rather than cashed. The Comfort Oversized Hoodie, the garment the value row was costed on, still stands in the maker’s own sale at $52.50. Its product page now prints the cloth’s weight, 440gsm, beside its 100 percent cotton composition, which the derivation could not find on it; but the fabric row grades the catalogue’s publishing habit, polyester-heavy training blends with weights absent on other lines, and that habit stands entire, so a single garment’s fuller file is printed as an improvement, not a re-pricing. The construction and fit records are unchanged, and the afterlife is still a 30-day returns window with no repair service behind it. The number’s status changes instead: set on the Represent page, audited here.
Gymshark or Vuori?
The two ends of the honest category. Gymshark at 58 sells training cloth as training cloth: compositions on the product pages, the flagship hoodie at $52.50 in its own sale, and no afterlife past a 30-day returns window. Vuori at 64, audited on its own page, sells the same day extended to the street: the Meta Pant at $138 in three fits at one held price, its cloth sold by name rather than by number, and a guarantee that is a returns promise. Buy Gymshark for the training itself and spend the difference elsewhere; buy Vuori when the garment has to keep working after the session ends. As brands it is 64 to 58, and the gap is the street half and the fit range, not the gym half.
Does Gymshark repair its clothes, or guarantee them?
Neither, in print. The maker’s own returns policy, read on its support pages, gives 30 days to return unwanted items in their original condition, and faulty items are handled through support, with photos possibly required for verification and no need to send the faulty item back. That is a fair returns window and a reasonable fault process. What the published record does not contain is an afterlife: no repair service, no mending or spare-parts programme, no resale rail, and no guarantee term that outlives the returns window. Past day 30, the garment’s life is the cloth’s own, which is what the longevity row of 7 has always recorded.
Why is Alo Yoga the skip on a page anchored by the budget house?
Because cheap is not the charge on this page; honesty is. The skip’s record was derived on our Vuori page and stands here as it stood there. Its three named fabrics are sold by adjective and campaign, and the flagship’s composition is the industry-standard legging blend, about 82 percent polyester and 18 percent elastane. Its men’s hero pant, at $128, is described by its own maker as performance-engineered fabric, with no composition named. Its list prices, $128 to $168, stand under a members-only 30 percent promotion its own store carries permanently, and behind the price there is no repair programme, no resale and no published guarantee. Gymshark, at 58, sells the same commodity cloth as commodity cloth, at $52.50, with the composition printed. The skip sells it as luxury.
The honesty section
Five scores on this page already stand in this series, and each card names its home: lululemon set at 72 and Rhone derived in the open at 61 on theirs, Vuori audited and confirmed at 64 on its own page, Cole Buxton set at 62 and the anchor set at 58 on theirs. The anchor’s 58 was set new on the Represent page and reproduced exactly, rows and all, on the Vuori page; this page audits it against the maker’s current published record, the costed garment’s product page and the maker’s returns policy read at this check, and confirms it on all five rows, so the Represent and Vuori pages’ figures need no reconciliation and none is flagged. The fabric audit records one genuine improvement, the flagship hoodie’s printed weight, and prints why it does not move the row in a single check. Two scores were derived in the open on the Vuori page and are reproduced here, labelled as that page’s derivations: Ten Thousand’s 63, from its published tech-spec blocks, prices and terms, and Alo Yoga’s 43, from its maker’s own product copy, store metadata and published terms. Prices and programmes were checked in October 2026 against the makers’ own published pages and current retail listings, following the method on our methodology page.
Buy links follow the deep-link rule: the maker’s own product page where a stable address exists, and each card keeps the door its scoring page established; the anchor’s door was re-verified live at this check. The skip ships without a buy link because the desk does not link what it sentences. Photographs come from the bank credited in CREDITS.md; the bank holds no frame of a Gymshark garment, no gym interior and no training frame on a body, the same gap the Vuori page admitted, and the cards run on the bank’s street, rail and folded-garment frames rather than on borrowed product photography.