New York · Born in SoHo · Roots in New York and Japan · Writing since 1999
YC monogramYOUNG COTTON
A wrist and watch at the edge of the sea, light moving on the water

Verdict Card · No. 43

Best Swim Shorts for Men: 7 Ranked, Scored, and One Sent Home

The sea is the garment's workplace. The ranking below is for the other half of its life: the walk to the water, the lunch after, the summers of chlorine and salt it has to survive.

Checked and updated October 2026

The verdict, up front: seven swim shorts scored out of 100 on cloth 30, construction 20, fit and inseam 20, value 15, longevity 15, plus the designer pair sent home. The Orlebar Brown Bulldog wins at 85: the tailored standard, side fasteners instead of elastic, a cloth woven in France, a five-year guarantee from the maker. The Patagonia Baggies are second at 84, the anti-tailored institution graded as exactly what it is and nearly winning anyway. And the pair sent home, at 44, is a $535 drawstring short whose cloth story is a print. Every fibre line below is printed where you can check it, and every claim a maker makes about recycled cloth is graded as a claim.

First, know which garment you are in

A swim short is graded on one question before all others: is it a tailored short that swims, or a gym short with a drawstring that got wet? The tailored answer has a flat front, a real closure, and a waist you adjust with hardware. The gym answer has an elastic waistband and a cord, and there is nothing wrong with it until it starts charging tailored money or wearing tailored language. This page scores the honesty of the claim as hard as the cloth. The Baggies, which claim nothing but durability, finish second. The $535 pair, which claims a heritage print and delivers an elastic waist, goes home.

Two boundaries, drawn in the open. The land short, the chino and linen short you wear to the same lunch dry, is ranked separately in the shorts ranking; this page is only for garments built to be swum in. And the boardshort is a different species: surf equipment, unlined by design, cut long against board rash, built to stay on in moving water rather than to read as clothing on land. The species is ruled in, once, as the control: the Birdwell 300 stands at fifth below, and its row scores draw the line better than an essay could. It wins longevity outright and loses the out-of-water test. That is the whole ruling.

The physics, briefly. Cotton drowns: a cotton short takes on water, gains weight, and hangs, which is why no ranked garment here is cotton-shelled and why the one cotton in the field is a lining, printed as one. Polyester is the honest cheap cloth, quick enough and colourfast, and it is graded as honest. Polyamide, nylon, is the better cloth: softer hand, faster dry, the tailored houses' choice. And every recycled claim in the field is read the same way this desk reads every claim: the certifier named, or the claim is printed as a claim and the row scores the composition line instead.

How the scores work

Every pair is scored out of 100 on the same five rows. Cloth (30) reads the fibre line first: what the shell actually is, then whether any recycled claim names a certifier or a percentage, then the dry and the hand. Construction (20) reads what holds the short up and what lines it: side adjusters and a zip fly score, elastic theatre scores less, and the liner question, mesh against brief, is answered on each card with the maker's own published answer. Fit and inseam (20) is scored against the inseam library this page prints: five inches shows thigh, seven is the middle ruling, nine approaches the knee, and past nine is boardshort water; the out-of-water test, does it read as a short on land, is graded inside this row. Value (15) is the score divided by the bill. Longevity (15) is the chlorine and salt audit: elastic dies first, then fade, then cloth, and the row is costed in summers in the table below. Row scores add to the total, on every card.

The ranking

No. 1 85/100

Orlebar Brown Bulldog Swim Shorts

The Winner

Price at last check: £295 at the maker's UK store, about $395; US doors list the Bulldog at $395.

Buy it in a solid colour, mid-length, and let the side fasteners do what no drawstring can. The one tailored swim short the rest of the field is measured against.

The cloth: 92 percent polyamide and 8 percent elastane on the maker's own composition line, woven in France, with a mesh lining in 100 percent polyester. That is the tailored recipe at its best: nylon's hand and dry, a stretch share for the water, a liner that drains. One charge, printed in the open: the maker's blurb calls the cloth a lightweight recycled nylon, and the composition line the same page publishes names no recycled percentage and no certifier. The claim is graded as a claim, and the row scores the line, which needs no help from the blurb to win the field.

The build and the fit: adjustable branded side fasteners that take the waist in by up to 2 centimetres without spoiling the line, a concealed snap and a zip fly, made in Portugal, in waist sizes 28 to 40. This is a trouser's architecture that happens to swim, and the out-of-water test is not close: the Bulldog reads as a short at lunch because it is cut like one. The maker prints no inseam figure; retail specification for the Bulldog gives a 6 inch inseam on a size 30, the middle of this page's library. Every Orlebar Brown swim short is guaranteed for five years, the maker's words, and the longevity row prices the guarantee as the floor it is.

Cloth (of 30)27
Construction (of 20)19
Fit & inseam (of 20)18
Value (of 15)8
Longevity (of 15)13

£295See it at Orlebar Brown →

No. 2 84/100

Patagonia Baggies Shorts 5 Inch

The Institution

US list price at last check: $75.

Buy the 5 inch in a dark solid and wear them for a decade. The anti-tailored short that makes its case on cloth and guarantee instead of silhouette.

The cloth: NetPlus, a 100 percent postconsumer recycled nylon made from recycled fishing nets, the feedstock named by the maker and the strongest recycled claim in the field: a source, not a slogan. The garment is Fair Trade Certified sewn, the mesh liner is 100 percent recycled polyester, and the water-repellent finish is the one honest debit, a coating being a thing that wears. The design has stood in the maker's line since the early 1980s essentially unchanged, which the cloth row reads as forty years of the same answer.

The build and the fit: an elastic waistband with an internal drawcord, worn openly as a gym waist and never dressed as anything else; pockets with self-draining mesh corners and a snap back pocket. The 5 inch inseam sits at the library's short end and the same short is sold at 7 inches, which is the fit library done honestly in two lengths. It fails the out-of-water test cheerfully and on purpose: the Baggies read as what they are. The maker's repair culture and guarantee stand behind the longevity row, second-highest on the page. One capture note, printed here rather than buried: the maker's own product page served a queue notice at this check, so the $75 list was verified across the maker's current retail listings, and the desk flags it for direct re-verification in the November pass.

Cloth (of 30)26
Construction (of 20)16
Fit & inseam (of 20)15
Value (of 15)13
Longevity (of 15)14

$75See it at Patagonia →

No. 3 76/100

Vilebrequin Moorea Swim Shorts

The Print Premium

Price at last check: €250 at the maker's European store, about $290; US doors list the Moorea from $280.

Buy it for the print and the making, knowing the waist is elastic: this is the luxury gym short, finished like jewellery and priced like it.

The cloth: a quick-drying recycled polyamide on the maker's own description, treated for fast dry, in the house print. The recycled claim names no percentage and no certifier on the product page read, so it is graded as a claim and the row scores the cloth's behaviour and finish instead, which are genuinely fine: this is the softest hand in the field after the winner. The garment was created in Saint-Tropez in 1971 and the pattern has been in continuous production since, which is a cloth record as well as a brand one.

The build and the fit: fully lined, and the lining is the detail of the page: a water-resistant mesh in 100 percent recycled polyamide, where the winner lines in polyester. Drawstring tips in engraved zamak, two back eyelets so the short does not balloon leaving the water, and a back pocket placed by hand so the print aligns. The waist is elastic with a drawstring, the gym architecture, and the construction row scores the finish at the top of that architecture rather than pretending it is another one. The maker prints a side leg length of 39.5 centimetres in a medium, the six inch class. A dedicated repair service stands behind the longevity row: the house will mend its own shorts, which is the correct answer to a €250 ticket.

Cloth (of 30)24
Construction (of 20)17
Fit & inseam (of 20)15
Value (of 15)7
Longevity (of 15)13

€250See it at Vilebrequin →

No. 4 73/100

Frescobol Carioca Classic Swim Shorts

The Hybrid Waist

US retail band at last check: $145 to $255 across the maker's US stockists; the maker's own US storefront price could not be captured at this check, so this card ships without a buy link.

Buy the Classic for the waistband idea: tailored in front, elastic behind, the compromise drawn honestly instead of hidden.

The cloth: the maker's own fit guide describes the Classic's architecture in detail and its shell composition in none, and the row charges the silence in the open: the house's Sport short is a bespoke polyamide textile by the maker's account, and the Classic's fibre line is not published in the maker's pages this desk could read. What is published, and remarkable, is the lining: a mesh in 100 percent cotton, the only cotton inside any garment here, slower to dry than mesh and far kinder against skin, a lining chosen like clothing rather than equipment.

The build and the fit: a tailored front waistband with an elasticated back, a zip and press-stud fastening, slit front pockets and a zipped back pocket, in waist sizes 30 to 38 at a short length. The hybrid waist is the most honest engineering compromise in the field: the front reads tailored at lunch, the back forgives the lunch. The maker's own guide draws the same line this page does, describing its fully tailored line as a short that does not look like a swim short and is made for the bar. Longevity carries the cotton lining's slower dry and the salt it holds, and the value row carries a price this desk could only verify at the maker's stockists, printed as a band rather than a figure.

Cloth (of 30)20
Construction (of 20)17
Fit & inseam (of 20)16
Value (of 15)9
Longevity (of 15)11
No. 5 70/100

Birdwell 300 Legend Boardshorts

The Boardshort, Ruled In

Price at last check: $150 at the maker's store.

Buy them for the surf and the decades. As a swim short they are the control that proves the rule, and the rule is printed on the card.

The cloth: two layers of SurfNyl, the house's own nylon, water-repellent and quick-drying by the maker's account, with no recycled claim made and none needed. Two-ply nylon is the heaviest cloth story in the field and the least apologetic: this is a working garment's material, sewn the same way in California since 1961.

The build and the fit: double and triple-needle reinforced seams throughout, made in the USA, and no liner at all, which is the species answer to the liner question: a boardshort is unlined by design, cut to stay on in moving water and to keep a board's wax off skin. The maker prints no inseam figure for the 300 and calls it a medium length between short and long; on the body it sits past this page's nine inch line, and the fit row scores the consequence plainly. It reads as surf kit at lunch, because it is surf kit. The lifetime guarantee the maker prints behind it takes the longevity row at full marks alongside the Baggies, and the ranking's point stands: the boardshort wins its own game completely and this one only in part.

Cloth (of 30)22
Construction (of 20)15
Fit & inseam (of 20)10
Value (of 15)9
Longevity (of 15)14

$150See it at Birdwell →

No. 6 68/100

Lands' End Volley Swim Trunks

The Attainable Institution

US list price at last check: $49.95; the maker's storefront product page could not be captured at this check, so this card ships without a buy link.

Buy the 7 inch on a code, which at this maker is most weeks: the honest family trunk, in the widest length library at the price.

The cloth: the volley trunk is the attainable institution's standing answer, and the desk prints its evidence the way it found it: the maker's current listings describe a quick-dry synthetic shell, secondary listings of the current garment read 100 percent polyester, and the maker's own product page resisted capture at this check, so the fibre line is scored as listed rather than as read from the maker, and flagged for the November pass. Polyester at this price is the honest cloth, and no recycled claim is made for it, which the row prefers to a claim it cannot check.

The build and the fit: an elastic waist with a drawstring and a mesh liner, the Hydroliner on the 7 inch, and the widest inseam library at the price in the field: volleys at 6, 7 and 9 inches across the line, in a size range that runs to big and tall. That library is the card's real argument: the tailored houses sell one length and the Baggies two, and this maker sells the whole ruling. The value row prints the house custom with the praise: Lands' End promotes swim so steadily that the list price is a reference figure and the code price is the real one, and the row scores something between the two.

Cloth (of 30)17
Construction (of 20)14
Fit & inseam (of 20)14
Value (of 15)13
Longevity (of 15)10
No. 7 64/100

Uniqlo Swim Active Shorts

The Attainable

US list price at last check: $29.90; the maker's page showed the garment in sale states at this check.

Buy the 5.5 inch as the spare pair and the travel pair: the cheapest honest way into the category, with the coating's lifespan understood.

The cloth: the maker's published description gives a water-repellent coating, a mesh lining and back pockets with drain holes, and the maker's US page at this check did not expose a fibre line to this desk, so the shell's composition is charged as silence in the open rather than filled in from habit. What can be scored is the design's honesty: a coating is a finish with a lifespan, and the longevity row prices its fade. No recycled claim is made on the page read.

The build and the fit: a pull-on elastic waist, mesh-lined, in two lengths, the 5.5 inch ranked here and an 8 inch sibling whose maker's size table prints inseams from 7.5 to 8.75 inches across XS to 3XL, the widest size run in the field. The brand stands at 84 in Brands Like No. 08 as the value benchmark, and this is that idea at the water's edge: correct architecture, published measurements, a price that makes the pair nearly disposable and a garment that is better than disposable. What you are not buying is a decade; the maker rotates its swim line seasonally, and the pair you replace in three summers may not exist to be rebought.

Cloth (of 30)15
Construction (of 20)13
Fit & inseam (of 20)14
Value (of 15)14
Longevity (of 15)8

$29.90See it at Uniqlo →

No. 8 44/100

Versace Barocco Swim Shorts

The Skip

Price at last check: $535 at retail; the same house's Barocco trunks were listed at $475 cut to $190 at a US department store at this check.

Leave them. At $535 the waist should be tailored, the cloth should be the story, and neither is. The print is the product, and the channel is already discounting it by 60 percent.

The cloth: a recycled polyester shell on the retailer's published description of the maker's garment, with no percentage and no certifier named, the weakest claim form in the field at the highest price in it. Polyester is the honest cheap cloth when Uniqlo sells it at $29.90. At $535, seven times the Baggies' price for a nylon with a named feedstock, the same fibre class wearing a baroque print is not a cloth story at all. The lining brief is printed with the house's Barocco pattern, which tells you what the lining is for: it is a billboard that only the wearer sees, and it is charged as one.

The build and the fit: an elasticated waist with a drawstring, the gym architecture this page convicts wherever it wears luxury language, at knee length, outside the inseam library at the long end without the boardshort's working excuse. Nothing here is badly made; everything here is priced as if the print were a material. The market has already graded the garment: the house's own channel lists the Barocco trunk at 60 percent off, the resale truth this desk prints whenever it finds it. It ships without a buy link, the way this desk sends home the pairs it convicts.

Cloth (of 30)14
Construction (of 20)11
Fit & inseam (of 20)9
Value (of 15)2
Longevity (of 15)8

The spec table

Maker's figures are the specifications the makers publish for these garments. Where a maker publishes no figure, the table prints the silence rather than an estimate: the Orlebar Brown inseam is a retailer's measurement and is labelled as one, and the Frescobol and Lands' End fibre lines could not be captured from the makers' own pages at this check, which is printed at the figure's elbow and charged in the rows.

ShortShellLinerWaistLength
Orlebar Brown Bulldog92% polyamide, 8% elastane, woven in France (maker's line)Mesh, 100% polyesterSide fasteners, snap and zip flyAbout 6 in inseam (retailer-measured, size 30)
Patagonia Baggies 5"NetPlus 100% postconsumer recycled nylon, from fishing nets (maker's line)Mesh, 100% recycled polyesterElastic, internal drawcord5 in; also sold at 7 in
Vilebrequin MooreaRecycled polyamide, share unpublished (maker's description)Mesh, 100% recycled polyamideElastic, drawstring, zamak tipsSide leg 39.5 cm in M (maker's figure)
Frescobol Carioca ClassicComposition unpublished in the maker's pages readMesh, 100% cotton (maker's guide)Tailored front, elasticated back, zip and press-studShort length; sizes 30 to 38
Birdwell 300 LegendSurfNyl nylon, two layers (maker's line)None, by designBoardshort lace and button closureMedium length; no inseam figure published
Lands' End VolleyQuick-dry synthetic; current listings read 100% polyester, maker's page uncapturedMesh (Hydroliner on the 7 in)Elastic, drawstring6, 7 and 9 in across the line
Uniqlo Swim ActiveFibre line not exposed on the maker's US page at this checkMesh (maker's description)Elastic pull-on5.5 in; 8 in sibling, maker-tabulated
Versace BaroccoRecycled polyester, share and certifier unnamed (retailer's description)Brief, Barocco-printedElastic, drawstringKnee length

Read the table as the ranking does: the fibre first, then the honesty about the fibre. Two makers name a feedstock or a full composition and stand behind it. Three print a recycled claim with no percentage behind it. And two could not be read from the maker's own page at all, which is printed here as a finding, not filled in as a guess.

Cost per wear, printed in the open

The assumption, printed before the numbers: a swim short in rotation is worn about 30 times a year across the warm season and trips, rinsed after swims. The life column is the service life our longevity row scores for, counted in presentable summers, not a promise. The Frescobol price is the middle of the US retail band printed on its card. The Vilebrequin price is the maker's euro figure converted at the rate its card prints.

ShortPriceScored lifeCost per wear
Patagonia Baggies 5"$7510 summers$0.25
Birdwell 300 Legend$15015 summers$0.33
Lands' End Volley$49.955 summers$0.33
Uniqlo Swim Active$29.903 summers$0.33
Frescobol Carioca ClassicAbout $2006 summers$1.11
Vilebrequin MooreaAbout $2908 summers$1.21
Orlebar Brown BulldogAbout $39510 summers$1.32
Versace Barocco$5354 summers$4.46

The table's shape is the category in miniature. The Baggies amortise at a quarter because a decade is a long denominator and $75 is a short numerator. The winner is the dearest honest way to swim per day, and this page prints that in the winner's hearing: what the Bulldog's premium buys is the tailored read on land, not economy. And the skip costs more per wear than the winner by a factor of three, because four summers is what a fashion rhythm gives and $535 is what it charges for them.

The skip: Versace's Barocco swim short at 44

Every house rule that governs this site's rankings lands on this pair at once. The waist is the gym waist, elastic and drawstring, wearing a $535 ticket. The cloth is a recycled polyester with no percentage and no certifier named, the claim form this desk grades as a claim, at seven times the price of a recycled nylon whose maker names the fishing nets it came from. The length is the knee, outside the library, without the boardshort's excuse of work to do there. And the conviction needs no outside witness, because the house's own channel supplies it: the Barocco trunk listed at $475 and cut to $190 at a US department store at this check, a 60 percent markdown on the current garment. Buy the Moorea if the print is the point: it is fully lined in recycled polyamide, repairable by its maker, and half the money. Buy the Baggies if the cloth is the point. The pair that sells a print as a material is the one to leave.

Which pair to buy

If you buy one: the Bulldog, in a solid colour. It is the only garment here that is tailored like a trouser, lined like equipment, and guaranteed like both. If the budget is the argument: the Baggies at $75, the best cost per wear on the page and a decade of summers, accepting the gym waist as the honest trade. If the print is the point: the Moorea, whose making earns part of its premium and whose maker will repair it. If you surf: the Birdwell, and wear it in the water it was built for. If you need a spare pair today: the Uniqlo or the Lands' End, eyes open about coatings and codes. The rest of the beach shelf is ranked too: the salt spray that survives the swim is in Verdict Card No. 25, the dry land short is in the shorts ranking, and where a short should end on the leg is mapped in the Body Map.

Questions, answered

What are the best swim shorts for men?

The Orlebar Brown Bulldog, scored 85 out of 100: a tailored swim short with adjustable side fasteners, a zip fly and a snap closure, in a polyamide cloth woven in France, guaranteed by the maker for five years. The Patagonia Baggies follow at 84, the anti-tailored institution graded as what it is. The pair sent home, at 44, charges $535 for a drawstring waist and a print.

Should swim shorts have a tailored waist or an elastic one?

A tailored waist, if the short has to work on land: side adjusters or a flat front with a real closure hold the short where a trouser sits and read as clothing out of the water. An elastic waist with a drawstring is a gym short's waist, honest on the Baggies, which never claim otherwise, and a ceiling everywhere else. What this page scores down is the elastic waist wearing tailored language, not the elastic itself.

Mesh liner or brief liner in swim shorts, and can you cut it out?

Mesh drains and dries; a brief liner holds and chafes less for some, more for others, and stays wet longer. The honest answer is that the liner is a preference wearing a spec sheet's clothes: what matters is that the maker tells you which one you are getting and what it is made of. Cutting a liner out is common and works, at the cost of the support the garment was cut around; this page treats a cut liner as the owner's alteration, not a defect.

What inseam should a swim short have?

Five inches shows thigh and suits a shorter or leaner leg; seven is the middle ruling, mid-thigh on most builds and the safest single buy; nine approaches the knee and suits a longer torso and leg. Past nine you are in boardshort territory, a different garment with its own rules. Match the inseam to the thigh you have, not the one in the photograph: the short should end where the thigh still has shape, not where it runs out.

Are boardshorts the same as swim shorts?

No, and this page rules on it in the open. A boardshort is surf equipment: unlined by design, built to stay on in moving water, cut long against board rash. A swim short is a garment that swims: lined, shorter, and judged on whether it reads as a short on land. One boardshort is admitted to this ranking as the control, the Birdwell 300, and it finishes fifth: it wins the longevity row outright and loses the out-of-water test, which is the species line drawn in scores.

How long should a pair of swim shorts last?

Chlorine and salt are the audit, and elastic is what fails first: the waistband gives out seasons before a good polyamide or nylon cloth does. A well-made pair in a rotation, rinsed after swims, is costed here at eight to ten summers; the guarantees tell the same story, five years from Orlebar Brown and a lifetime guarantee from Birdwell. A fashion pair on a replacement rhythm is costed at three to four, and the cost-per-wear table prints what that rhythm does to the arithmetic.

How this ranking stays honest

Three rests and four capture notes, printed. H&M was rested deliberately: the desk chose the designer conviction the evidence supported at the top of the market rather than the familiar one at the bottom, and the running H&M derivation printed on Brands Like H&M is untouched by this page. L.L.Bean was rested because no dedicated swim short listing could be verified from the maker's own store at this check. Fair Harbor and the recycled-bottle school were rested because their recycled claims could not be read from the makers' own pages at this check, and this page does not rank a claim it cannot read. On capture: Patagonia's own product page served a queue notice, so its price was verified across the maker's retail listings and is flagged for the November pass, as are the Frescobol storefront price, the Lands' End product page and fibre line, and the Uniqlo fibre line. On photography: the magazine's bank holds no swim, beach or pool frame at all, a gap the desk admits here rather than covering with a mislabelled picture; the hero is the sea itself, one honest frame, and the cards run without images, with swim frames at the top of the harvest list. Prices and specifications were checked against the makers' own listings in October 2026; where a figure could not be verified from the maker's page, the page says so at the figure's elbow. The full method is written out on the methodology page.